Dear Editor:
I am writing in support of the proposed new Summerland Recreation Facility which is scheduled to go to a plebiscite vote on Nov. 4.
I am an eight-year resident and homeowner in Summerland. I am a fairly regular user of the present inadequate and antiquated Summerland Recreation Centre. I work out usually three days a week at the centre and occasionally swim as well. I enjoy the facility’s staff and management for their cheerful and accommodating support of the users.
I have two grandchildren aged seven and 11 who are members of the Orca Swim Club and through their training they are excellent swimmers and it is a delight for our family to attend their meets. I am dismayed at the inadequate public seating and viewing when our Orca Swim Club hosts such events.
I have had a number of people look at the likely tax increases in order to fund the proposed recreation facility. Most of the people I have talked to support and are prepared to take on the proposed tax increases.
I have had a number of people who say, “Oh I am retired and can’t afford these tax increases!” To which I have to say this is incorrect. The point is our community is growing, our population is increasing and the use and value of our recreational facilities needs to keep pace.
What can a person do if they cannot pay for the proposed tax increase that is a consequence of an approved plebiscite on Nov. 4?
First, most people who are retired and are homeowners have enjoyed a considerable value increase in their property as a result of our community and the Okanagan generally being a popular area to retire to. My family is fortunate that we can afford the proposed taxation increase.
Second, all homeowners who are 55 and older can apply to the government for property tax deferrals.
You can apply to defer a portion or all of the residential, or residential and farm property taxes after the home owner grant is deducted. If you qualify for the home owner grant, you must apply for it separately every year.
You have to retain ownership of the property and the payment of unpaid taxes plus accrued interest is to be made either at the point of a sale or the settlement of the estate.
This will put a small financial burden on your property at the time you sell it or it is passed on to your heirs. However you have joined in supporting and making our community a better place for all.
And you have relieved yourself of a relatively minor financial burden that your estate can easily remedy when it is sold or the heirs cover the interest-bearing loan that will have accrued on your house and property during your use of it.
I firmly believe we as a community need to move forward with a positive vote for yes on Nov. 4.
Ken Robertson
Summerland