With Mayor John Vassilaki having the deciding vote, council approved a controversial four-storey, eight-unit development at 602 Lakeshore Drive. (Monique Tamminga Western News)

With Mayor John Vassilaki having the deciding vote, council approved a controversial four-storey, eight-unit development at 602 Lakeshore Drive. (Monique Tamminga Western News)

Lawsuit over controversial Penticton Lakeshore development

The city is being sued by a society focused on ensuring the city follows existing bylaws

The City of Penticton is facing a lawsuit over a development on Lakeshore Drive.

A newly formed organization called the Penticton Society for Transparent Governance and Responsible Development filed the civil petition in BC Supreme Court in Kelowna on April 5.

The lawsuit seeks to force a review of the city and council’s approval in order to revoke the development variances that were approved on Jan. 18.

READ MORE: Penticton approves controversial Lakeshore development

That decision was a split vote, with Couns. Julius Bloomfield, Katie Robinson, Campbell Watt and Mayor John Vassilaki all supporting the project, while James Miller, Frank Regeher and Judy Sentes opposed it as presented.

The society was incorporated on March 30, and its directors — Peter Gerald Achtem, Jeanette Shawn Beaven, Gary Vernon Denton and Dennis George Hayashi — are named in the petition to the court.

According to the court documents, the purpose of the society is to ensure the city adheres to its zoning bylaws.

The development is an eight-unit residential complex built on the property, which required both rezoning and variances to be approved by council.

According to the lawsuit, what council approved is in excess of the size of the property allowed, and that the need for variances underscores this. Under the city’s zoning bylaw, the property’s 1,112-square-metre coverage is below the minimum of 1,400 for the RM3 zoning, and more than twice the 540 area required for the previous RM2 zoning.

“By purporting to rezone this property, [the city] has attempted to create a new zone in which properties that do not meet the width and size requirements of RM3 can nonetheless be developed to the extend provided under RM3.” the lawsuit reads. “[The city] has purported to do indirectly what it cannot do directly.”

The controversial development saw dozens of residents provide feedback in a public hearing and through written correspondence to the city prior to approval.

None of the allegations in the lawsuit have been proven in court.

READ MORE: Public hearing on controversial Penticton Lakeshore Drive development

To report a typo, email: editor@pentictonwesternnews.com.

Don’t miss a single story and get them deliver directly to your inbox. Sign up today for the Penticton Western News Newsletter.


@PentictonNews
newstips@pentictonwesternnews.com

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

BC Supreme Court

Be Among The First To Know

Sign up for a free account today, and receive top headlines in your inbox Monday to Saturday.

Sign Up with google Sign Up with facebook

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reset your password

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.



Don't have an account? Click here to sign up
Pop-up banner image