The Arena Banquet Room was filled to capacity for the open house on the proposed Urban Growth Plan on Monday evening.

Growth strategy resisted

Summerland’s proposed Urban Growth Plan received strong opposition at a public hearing on Monday evening.

Summerland’s proposed Urban Growth Plan received strong opposition at a public hearing on Monday evening.

The hearing in the Arena Banquet Room drew a packed house as more than 40 people voiced their concerns about the plan.

Others had earlier sent written submissions, the majority in opposition to the proposal.

The Urban Growth Plan calls for the removal of 80.34 hectares of land within the Agricultural Land Reserve close to the core of the community.

In exchange, 91.7 hectares in the Prairie Valley area would be added to the land reserve.

“There is no need to remove prime ALR land,” said Kimberly Westgate. “There is land outside the ALR which could be developed.”

She added that hillsides, not valley bottom land, should be developed.

Don Gayton, a professional agrologist, said the need for additional growth is overstated.

He said the average selling time of a house in Summerland is around 130 days, while in the rest of the Okanagan Valley, the selling time is 90 days. The vacancy rates for homes and condominium units in Summerland are much higher than the provincial average, he added.

John Barber said a referendum is needed before adopting the proposed growth plan. “I feel there is more to lose than to gain,” he added.

Keith Carlson, chief executive officer of the Okanagan Plant Improvement Corporation, said agriculture is an important part of the community. Over the years, fruit varieties from Summerland have gained a strong reputation worldwide.

“Houses can be built anywhere; farm land is valuable,” he said.

Dru Yates said the land exchange is not fair, since the land to be removed is of a much higher quality than the land to be added to the land reserve.

“I see this as nothing more than a shell game being played with the Prairie Valley lands,” added Julie Sardinha.

Barbara Thorburn said the recommendations from the growth report do not reflect the wishes of the public.

“We need to have a deep, meaningful consultation about this issue,” she said.

John Gordon, who farms close to the core of the community, said there are many vacant properties between his farm and the downtown area.

He added that there are other opportunities for growth, without the need for removing land from the land reserve.

David Finnis said the agricultural land will be needed for food production in the future. He said a large-scale drought in California should show the importance of local food security.

“We have a responsibility to the future to preserve this land.”

George Brake said the growth plan makes sense in the short term, but is not a good long-term strategy.

“In the future, we are going to need every bit of our prime agricultural land,” he said. “When you cannot eat, nothing else matters.

Supporting the proposed plan, Pam Killick, a farmer, said housing is needed.

“We need to build homes in the downtown core to keep young people here,” she said.

Don Hudgeon said the growth plan as presented makes sense because it keeps development close to the existing services and utilities.

He added that the plan reflects the comments from the public during the consultation process.

“It’s the result of what the majority of interested people in Summerland wanted,” he said. “They are just doing what we asked them to do.”

Chamber president Arlene Fenrich said consultation process was inclusive and comprehensive.

She added that densification will help to create a more walkable community.

Now that the public hearing has been completed, the second and third readings of the bylaw on the growth plan will be considered at the council meeting on Monday, March 10.

Coun. Lloyd Christopherson and Coun. Bruce Hallquist, who both own land in the area affected, were not present at the public hearing and will not be present when the decision on the plan is made at the next council meeting.


Just Posted

LETTER: Concerns about effects of Lark development

Impact on aquifer and ground movement must be considered

LETTER: Internet slow in Garnett Valley

I have a home office like many people and most of my work requires a much higher speed than 2.5 mbps

LETTER: OCP amendment should be considered carefully

Much of what should be discussed is dictated by your community plan and other support documents

LETTER: Thanks for support

Assistance following operation was appreciated

LETTER: Examining claims about development proposal

They are not interested in preserving the land. They are interested in preserving their view

Tsunami warnings 101: Canada

Here are some things to know about tsunami alerts in Canada and how they work

10 Safeways in Lower Mainland to close, union says

Locations in Vancouver, Burnaby, Surrey, Coquitlam, Richmond and Mission slated to shut

“Miraculous that nobody was killed”

Tanker full of aviation fuel involved in Highway 3 crash

Vancouver Islanders ponder need for tsunami siren song

Alarm sounds in Port Alberni but not at the DND base in Esquimalt

Babcock, Goyette and Smyth honoured at Order of Hockey in Canada

Mike Babcock, from Saskatoon, guided the Detroit Red Wings to a Stanley Cup in 2008

Bell Canada alerts customers who may be affected by latest data breach

Federal Office of the Privacy Commissioner said it had been notified

‘The tsunami alarm failed my household’: North Coast residents concerned over sirens, alerts

People living in northern communities share how they learned about Tuesday’s tsunami warning

Flying squirrel touches down inside Salmon Arm home

Rodent jumps around residence before homeowers encourage it back outdoors

Most Read