A proposed development in the Banks Crescent area has sparked protest by some in the community.
The members of Summerlanders for Sensible Development, as well as others in the community, have written letters, posted signs and signed petitions, stating their opposition to the project.
The number of names is significant, with an estimated 1,500 who have signed so far.
However, the volume of support or opposition for a project should not determine its outcome.
In a democratic society, the voters elect representatives to make decisions. Once the representatives are in office, it is up to them to act in the best interests of their communities.
The decision on Banks Crescent or any other controversial proposal must be about what is best for the community in the long term.
For this reason, the concerns raised about issues such as slope stability, water sources, traffic volumes and the potential impact on the fish hatchery must be taken seriously.
Municipal representatives are considering these points and are researching them before a public hearing will be held.
However, the volume of community support or opposition should not be the sole determining factor in any government decision.
Not all unpopular plans are bad ideas, and by the same token, not all popular plans are good ideas.
There are times for elected officials to take unpopular stands.
The questions about the potential long-term effects of this development proposal must be researched and answered.
Once the members of council have their answers, they will be able to determine whether they think the plan is in the best interests of the community.
This decision should be based on the proposal, not on the number of people who support or oppose it.